According to the Code13 site: www.code13rugbyleague.com/2011/0 ... um=twitter

According to the Code13 site: www.code13rugbyleague.com/2011/0 ... um=twitter

Now on Saints site saintsrlfc.com/news/page/654

Now on Saints site saintsrlfc.com/news/page/654

Excellent news, we can get on with the season now.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out Kyle.

what would count as serious misconduct?

Bizarre, what a shame Eastmond is behaving this way, 18 months ago he looked like he could be one of Saints and England's better players. Some people don't appreciate the position they're in, he obviously doesn't want to bother with Saints now he knows he's going, disappointing.

Terrible start to the season for Saints so far, they may argue otherwise? But 2 'home' defeats, losing one of their best players (however you look at it) and poor attendances at the Stobart, Royce has got a job on.

If we can avoid conjecture on the nature of the misconduct, then the thrad can be kept open. I have no idea about any allegations. What I would say, however, is that Saints have a very clear vested interest in ending Eastmond's contract ASAP without having to pay him off.

List could be endless there......very vague comment that.

Maybe we have found an available Scrum half knocking about somewhere

Several Saints fans have commented on "gestures" that may have been made towards the crowd on Friday.

I don't think anybody really believed Eastmond had the mental fortitude to win over the boo boys, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he's done something silly and Saints wouldn't be devastated if he tripped himself up . . .

Think I posted on another thread that Kyle did something and did anyone think we could sack him for it.

Might not be the same incident but as I said in the other thread, it was a player that told me about what he'd done after the game.

you know how it'll look though if you sack him and he's goes to union 6months early......BAD

For who? Not for Saints.