|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 83 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2013 | Dec 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17134 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2020 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'm all for the right rule changes, but not these. Reasons being:
1. Aside from the feed, the same rules should apply to attack and defence.
2. There is enough distortion already, with not applying the knock on rule.
3. Really don't like this. The onus should be on the defending team to get the ball and run it back. This just encourages them to wait and let a ball run dead.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 286 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Jul 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| If rule three came in It would have a big impact on the way Leeds play the game we Often Kick the ball dead So we can set up our defence
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Agree with Richie, don't like any of these rules. I wouldn't mind seeing Rule #1 trialled in lower league games, it has the possibility to open things up either with an extra attacking player or a possible defensive push in the scrum, but a definite no to rules 2 & 3.
|
|
|
 |
|