| 
 | 
                        
        | Rank | Posts | Team |  | Club Owner | 4761 | No Team
 Selected
 |  | Joined | Service | Reputation |  | Oct 2004 | 21 years |  |  
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |  | Dec 2020 | Nov 2019 | LINK |  | Milestone Posts |  |  |  | Milestone Years |  |  |  | Location |  |  |  | Signature |  | TO BE FIXED |  |  | Lot of talk on here about wingers but lets be honest, they are hardly the problem here.
 
 1. No organising scrum half,
 2. No props at all - thus negating the need for 1 really (unless we're signing a vintage Andrew Johns),
 3. Centres are undersized,
 4. Hooker isnt providing any attacking value other than passing the ball off the ground.
 
 The big problem for Wigan is physicality, as I see it. The entire pack, bar Greeenwood and Lockers, is undersized, as are our starting centres. The last time we had a truly undersized front row was c. 2003/2004 when Faz was playing prop, and you know what - we played tactics to maximise our chances. We didnt try and 'mix it up the middle' as we had no muscle, we took the ball out wide regularly and ran the opposition ragged. It seems we arent smart enough to see this currently.
 
 Top to tail, there are a number of issues with Wigan and it all boils down to being cheap in the market:
 
 1. Hardaker
 2. Davies
 3. Gildart
 4.
 5. Manfredi
 6. Williams
 7.
 8.
 9.
 10. Flower
 11. Greenwood
 12. Farrell
 13. O'Loughlin
 
 14. Leuluai
 15. Bullock
 16. A.N. Other Impact-making prop
 17. A.N. Other Impact-making second rower
 
 Get rid of: Isa, Tautai, Navarette, Sammut, Sarginson, Clubb (retiring?), Hamlin, Joe Burgess,
 Fine backups/depth: Escare, Powell, Marshall, Hankinson, The kids (i.e. Jack Wells, Paisley, etc).
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
                        
        | Rank | Posts | Team |  | Club Captain | 4321 | No Team
 Selected
 |  | Joined | Service | Reputation |  | Aug 2018 | 7 years |  |  
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |  | Jun 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |  | Milestone Posts |  |  |  | Milestone Years |  |  |  | Location |  |  |  | Signature |  | TO BE FIXED |  |  | Quote rubber duckie="rubber duckie"See I knew you'd say that. It was a loaded question....that reply goes totally against the grain of your whole initial brave post....
 Lockers desperate value to the team and only being able to forfil 2 handfuls of games a season, is why Wigan ought to have been looking for a replacement that can play 6 handfuls as season.
 
 Wigan seriously are looking at this inside down....you cannot save lockers in games like London...it was imperative he played today... he must play vs Giants as this IS the biggest game you'll have all season if fortunes don't change, and you cant use hindsight, I can't see where that next win is going to happen.
 
 Lockers needs to be rested again Saints Wire and Cas, games you'll not win and played vs London Hudds KR.'"
 
Lockers should have retired at the end of last season. Just shows how difficult it is to replace anybody in SL, and how the quality on the field, on the whole, has diminished so rapidly over the last 5 years. |